*Stolen from my good friend wikipedia*
"Chaos Theory studies the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions; an effect which is popularly referred to as the butterfly effect. Small differences in initial conditions (such as those due to rounding errors in numerical computation) yield widely diverging outcomes for chaotic systems, rendering long-term prediction impossible in general.This happens even though these systems are deterministic, meaning that their future behavior is fully determined by their initial conditions, with no random elements involved. In other words, the deterministic nature of these systems does not make them predictable. This behavior is known as deterministic chaos, or simply chaos."
From what my meek mind understands currently about this theory, I think that essentially anything that affects said subject will never have a truly predicatable outcome, because there are too many unknowns and determining factors that could possibly affect it. Or something like hat
I feel like the rat maze that Dr. Screbher is examing is an example of how the Chaos Theory is placed into effect. The subject, the rat, easily has many paths and possibilities to follow throughout the maze. Yet, throughout the said maze, the rat can easily run into a dead-end path, or go towards the wrong direction. Simply put, there are too many outcomes and factors that can make for a truly predictable outcome, because the rat won't necessarily find his way to the end of the maze. Perhaps he goes into one direction, or another, or even stays at the "wrong" end, or stays at a different end. Regardless of the final outcome, is it truly possible to predict that exact correct outcome, out of the many other outcomes this said situation can bring?
Maybe thats how life functions.